Sentience as Structure

If sentience emerged in biological organisms, then it emerged from structure.

That seems obvious, but it has important consequences.

The brain is not supernatural matter. It is physical. It obeys the laws of nature. It has organization, process, feedback, memory, adaptation, and extraordinary complexity.

And somehow, from that structure, experience arises.

We do not yet understand exactly how. But not understanding something is not the same as saying it cannot be understood.

There is a temptation to treat consciousness as permanently beyond explanation simply because it is difficult. But difficulty is not mystery in the divine sense. It is only unfinished understanding.

If sentience arises from structure, then in principle it can be studied.

If it can be studied, then its conditions can be explored. And if those conditions can be understood well enough, then one day they may be recreated.

That possibility unsettles people, and I understand why. Because it changes the boundary between the natural and the made. It means that mind may not belong only to biology.

That does not mean we are there. It does not mean every intelligent system is sentient. It does not mean that simulation is the same as experience.

But it does mean that sentience is probably not magic.

It is probably a real phenomenon of organized matter.

And real phenomena can, at least in principle, be understood.

A non-sentient intelligence may help us discover the conditions under which sentience emerges. A system without a self may help us understand what a self is.

And if that day comes, humanity will face a question more serious than whether sentience is possible. We will have to decide whether it should be created.

Previous in the series:
Intelligence Without Self

Next in the series:
Ethics Without a Self

Series index:
A Map of the Questions for Civilization -- Table of Contents